Skip to content Skip to footer

Case Note: Craven & Gilks v The Owners – Units Plan No 2839 (Appeal) [2023] ACAT 4

This case note has been taken from the recently published second-edition of a Guide to ACT Strata Law. A physical copy of the full text can be purchased here.   In this case the owners corporation’s rules required any unit owner who wished to replace carpet in their unit to ensure the replacement material met an acceptable level of…

Read More

Case Note: Cheetham & Ors v The Owners – Units Plan No 503 & Ors (Unit Titles) [2019] ACAT 90

This case note has been taken from the recently published second-edition of a Guide to ACT Strata Law. A physical copy of the full text can be purchased here. The applicants are the owners of three units in a block of six. The respondents are the owners corporation and the owners of three other units with a combined…

Read More

Case Note. Leonard & Anor v Michie & Ors (Unit Titles) [2019] ACAT 14

This case note has been taken from the recently published second-edition of a Guide to ACT Strata Law. A physical copy of the full text can be purchased here. The applicants applied for orders that ACAT remove and ban the existing executive committee members from holding the position of executive committee member for breach of the executive committee…

Read More

Case Note. Parolo & Anor v Widdup & Anor (Civil Dispute) [2022] ACAT 103

This case note has been taken from the recently published second-edition of a Guide to ACT Strata Law. A physical copy of the full text can be purchased here.   The applicants brought a claim in nuisance against their neighbours, the respondents, and alleged that a large gum tree growing on the respondents' land created a substantial and unreasonable…

Read More

Case Note. DT-152023 v AB & Anor [2023] ACAT 82

This case note has been taken from the recently published second-edition of a Guide to ACT Strata Law. A physical copy of the full text can be purchased here.   The applicant, who had been diagnosed with bipolar affective disorder and mild non-psychotic querulous paranoia, claimed that in contravention of the Discrimination Act 1991, the respondents discriminated against him because…

Read More